Preferred Interpersonal Distances: A Global Comparison

First Published March 22, 2017 Research Article

Authors

1
 
University of Wroclaw, Poland
by this author
, 1
 
University of Wroclaw, Poland
by this author
, 2
 
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
by this author
,
3
 
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sopot, Poland
by this author
, 1
 
University of Wroclaw, Poland
by this author
, 4
 
Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
by this author
, 5
 
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
by this author
, 6
 
University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
by this author
, 7
 
Catholic University of Milan, Italy
by this author
, 8
 
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
by this author
, 9
 
Pontificia Universidad Católica Del Perú, Lima, Peru
by this author
, 1
 
University of Wroclaw, Poland
by this author
, 1011
 
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
 
D’Or Institute for Research and Education, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
by this author
, 121314
 
Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS, Moscow, Russia
 
Russian State University for the Humanities, Russia
 
Moscow State University, Russia
by this author
, 15
 
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
by this author
, 16
 
Ankara University, Turkey
by this author
, 17
 
University of Coimbra, Portugal
by this author
, 18
 
Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
by this author
, 18
 
Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
by this author
, 5
 
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
by this author
, 19
 
Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
by this author
, 7
 
Catholic University of Milan, Italy
by this author
, 12
 
Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology RAS, Moscow, Russia
by this author
, 20
 
Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey
by this author
, 21
 
Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
by this author
, 22
 
Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
by this author
, 23
 
Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey
by this author
, 24
 
Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
by this author
, 25
 
University of Zagreb, Croatia
by this author
, 7
 
Catholic University of Milan, Italy
by this author
, 26
 
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine
by this author
, 27
 
Federal Neuro-Psychiatric Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria
by this author
, 28
 
University of Belgrade, Serbia
by this author
, 29
 
Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, China
by this author
, 30
 
University of Nairobi, Kenya
by this author
, 31
 
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
by this author
, 24
 
Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey
by this author
, 6
 
University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
by this author
, 15
 
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
by this author
, 32
 
National University of Entre Rios, Concepción del Uruguay, Argentina
by this author
, 33
 
Philadelphia University, PA, USA
by this author
, 34
 
University of Granada, Spain
by this author
, 35
 
University of Pécs, Hungary
by this author
, 1
 
University of Wroclaw, Poland
by this author
, 36
 
Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
by this author
, 37
 
University of Science and Culture, Tehran, Iran
by this author
, 38
 
University of Vienna, Austria
by this author
, 39
 
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
by this author
, 40
 
Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda
by this author
, 38
 
University of Vienna, Austria
by this author
, 41
 
Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba-Akoko, Nigeria
by this author
, 42
 
Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia
by this author
, 43
 
University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
by this author
, 1
 
University of Wroclaw, Poland
by this author
, 17
 
University of Coimbra, Portugal
by this author
, 32
 
National University of Entre Rios, Concepción del Uruguay, Argentina
by this author
, 4445
 
University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
 
University of Tartu, Estonia
by this author
, 17
 
University of Coimbra, Portugal
by this author
, 46
 
Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia
by this author
, 47
 
University of Karachi, Pakistan
by this author
, 25
 
University of Zagreb, Croatia
by this author
, 48
 
Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia
by this author
, 38
 
University of Vienna, Austria
by this author
, 26
 
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv, Ukraine
by this author
, 49
 
TU Dresden, Germany
by this author
, 50
 
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
by this author
, 51
 
South-West University “Neofit Rilski,” Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
by this author
, 52
 
Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
by this author
, 53
 
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
by this author
, 25
 
University of Zagreb, Croatia
by this author
, 54
 
Mõttemaru OÜ, Tartu, Estonia
by this author
, 55
 
Rio de Janeiro State University, Brazil
by this author
, 56
 
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore, India
by this author
, 57
 
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India
by this author
, 57
 
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, India
by this author
, 58
 
Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine
by this author
, 15
 
Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
by this author
, 59
 
Kyung Hee University, Seoul, South Korea
by this author
, 33
 
Philadelphia University, PA, USA
by this author
...
First Published Online: March 22, 2017

Human spatial behavior has been the focus of hundreds of previous research studies. However, the conclusions and generalizability of previous studies on interpersonal distance preferences were limited by some important methodological and sampling issues. The objective of the present study was to compare preferred interpersonal distances across the world and to overcome the problems observed in previous studies. We present an extensive analysis of interpersonal distances over a large data set (N = 8,943 participants from 42 countries). We attempted to relate the preferred social, personal, and intimate distances observed in each country to a set of individual characteristics of the participants, and some attributes of their cultures. Our study indicates that individual characteristics (age and gender) influence interpersonal space preferences and that some variation in results can be explained by temperature in a given region. We also present objective values of preferred interpersonal distances in different regions, which might be used as a reference data point in future studies.

Aiello, J. R. (1987). Human spatial behavior. In Stokols, D., Altman, I. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 389-504). New York, NY: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Aiello, J. R., Jones, S. E. (1971). Field study of the proxemic behavior of young school children in three subcultural groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 351-356.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Andersen, P. (1988). Explaining intercultural differences in nonverbal communication. In Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E. (Eds.), Intercultural communication: A reader (5th ed., pp. 272-281). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
Anderson, C. A. (1987). Temperature and aggression: Effects on quarterly, yearly, and city rates of violent and nonviolent crime. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1161-1173.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Baldassare, M., Feller, S. (1975). Cultural variations in personal space. Ethos, 3, 481-503.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S. (2014). Package lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. Journal od Statistical Software, 67, 1-48.
Google Scholar | ISI
Beaulieu, C. (2004). Intercultural study of personal space: A case study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 794-805.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bogardus, E. (1954). Sociology. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Borisova, L. V., Butovskaya, M. L. (2004). Spatial behavior in modern Russian urban culture: Age and gender factors. In Butovskaya, M. L. (Ed.), Human ethology: Modern quantitative methods (pp. 13-20). Moscow, Russia: Russian State University for Humanities.
Google Scholar
Burgess, J. W. (1983). Interpersonal spacing behavior between surrounding nearest neighbors reflects both familiarity and environmental density. Ethology and Sociobiology, 4, 11-17.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Burgoon, J. K. (1991). Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 233-259.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dean, L. M., Willis, F. N., Hewitt, J. (1975). Initial interaction distance among individuals equal and unequal in military rank. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 294-299.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Epstein, Y. M., Karlin, R. A. (1975). Effects of acute experimental crowding. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 34-53.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Evans, G. W., Howard, R. B. (1973). Personal space. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 334-344.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Evans, G. W., Lepore, S. J., Allen, K. M. (2000). Cross-cultural differences in tolerance for crowding: Fact or fiction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 204-210.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Faulkner, J., Schaller, M., Park, J. H., Duncan, L. A. (2004). Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7, 333-353.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Felipe, N. J., Sommer, R. (1966). Invasions of personal space. Social Problems, 14, 206-214.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fenichel, E. P. (2013). Economic considerations for social distancing and behavioral based policies during an epidemic. Journal of Health Economics, 32, 440-451.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Fincher, C. L., Thornhill, R. (2012). Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 35, 61-79.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Fischer, R., Van de Vliert, E. (2011). Does climate undermine subjective well-being? A 58-nation study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1031-1041.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ford, J. G., Graves, J. R. (1977). Differences between Mexican-American and White children in interpersonal distance and social touching. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 779-785.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Forston, R. F., Larson, C. U. (1968). The dynamics of space: An experimental study in proxemic behavior among Latin Americans and North Americans. Journal of Communication, 18, 109-116.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gérin-Lajoie, M., Richards, C. L., McFadyen, B. J. (2006). The circumvention of obstacles during walking in different environmental contexts: A comparison between older and younger adults. Gait & Posture, 24, 364-369.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Goldstein, H., Healy, M. J. (1995). The graphical presentation of a collection of means. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society,. Series A (Statistics in Society), 158, 175-177.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Google Scholar
Hayduk, L. A. (1983). Personal space: Where we now stand. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 293-335.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Heshka, S., Nelson, Y. (1972). Interpersonal speaking distance as a function of age, sex, and relationship. Sociometry, 35, 491-498.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hofstede, G. (1981). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management and Organizations, 10, 15-41.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Horenstein, V. D. P., Downey, J. L. (2003). A cross-cultural investigation of self-disclosure. North American Journal of Psychology, 5, 373-386.
Google Scholar
Human Development Report . (2013). Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/reports/14/hdr2013_en_complete.pdf
Google Scholar
IJzerman, H., Semin, G. R. (2010). Temperature perceptions as a ground for social proximity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 867-873.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Little, K. B. (1968). Cultural variations in social schemata. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 1-7.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Mazur, A. (1977). Interpersonal spacing on public benches in “contact” vs. “noncontact” cultures. The Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 53-58.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Olsson, M. J., Lundström, J. N., Kimball, B. A., Gordon, A. R., Karshikoff, B., Hosseini, N., Lekander, M. (2014). The scent of disease human body odor contains an early chemosensory cue of sickness. Psychological Science, 25, 817-823.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Özcan, B., Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Social trust and human development. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40, 753-762.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ozdemir, A. (2008). Shopping malls: Measuring interpersonal distance under changing conditions and across cultures. Field Methods, 20, 226-248.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Patterson, M. L., Edinger, J. A. (1987). A functional analysis of space in social interaction. In Siegman, A. W., Feldstein, S. (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (pp. 523-562). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Google Scholar
Rands, M., Levinger, G. (1979). Implicit theories of relationship: An intergenerational study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 645-661.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rapp, M. A., Gutzmann, H. (2000). Invasions of personal space in demented and nondemented elderly persons. International Psychogeriatrics, 12, 345-352.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
R Core Team . (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org/
Google Scholar
Regoeczi, W. C. (2008). Crowding in context: An examination of the differential responses of men and women to high-density living environments. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49, 254-268.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Remland, M. S., Jones, T. S., Brinkman, H. (1995). Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: Effects of culture, gender, and age. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 281-297.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Sawada, Y. (2003). Blood pressure and heart rate responses to an intrusion on personal space. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 115-121.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schaller, M., Murray, D. R. (2008). Pathogens, personality, and culture: Disease prevalence predicts worldwide variability in sociosexuality, extraversion, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 212-221.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Schweon, S. J., Edmonds, S. L., Kirk, J., Rowland, D. Y., Acosta, C. (2013). Effectiveness of a comprehensive hand hygiene program for reduction of infection rates in a long-term care facility. American Journal of Infection Control, 41, 39-44.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Shuter, P. (1976). Proxemics and tactility in Latin America. Journal of Communication, 26, 46-52.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Smith, H. W. (1981). Territorial spacing on a beach revisited: A cross-national exploration. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 132-137.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space: The behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Sommer, R. (2002). Personal space in a digital age. In Bechtel, R. B., Churchman, A. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 647-660). New York, NY: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
Sorokowski, P., Sabiniewicz, A., Sorokowska, A. (2015). The impact of dominance on partner’s height preferences and height-related mate choices. Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 220-224.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Onyishi, I. E., Szarota, P. (2013). Montesquieu hypothesis and football: Players from hot countries are more expressive after scoring a goal. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44, 421-430.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sussman, N. M., Rosenfeld, H. M. (1982). Influence of culture, language, and sex on conversational distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 66-74.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15011-15016.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Triandis, H., Triandis, L. (1967). Some studies of social distance. In Fishbein, M. (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 199-206). New York, NY: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
United Nations Report . (2015). Population division. Retrieved from http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm
Google Scholar
Van de Vliert, E. (2011). Climato-economic origins of variation in ingroup favoritism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 494-515.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Van de Vliert, E. (2013). Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 36, 465-480.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Van de Vliert, E., Postmes, T. (2012). Climato-economic livability predicts societal collectivism and political autocracy better than parasitic stress does. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 35, 94-95.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Van de Vliert, E., Schwartz, S. H., Huismans, S. E., Hofstede, G., Daan, S. (1999). Temperature, cultural masculinity, and domestic political violence. A cross-national study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 291-314.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Vranic, A. (2003). Personal space in physically abused children. Environment & Behavior, 35, 550-565.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Watson, O. M. (1970). Proxemic behavior: A cross-cultural study. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Watson, O. M., Graves, T. D. (1966). Quantitative research in proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 68, 971-985.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Webb, J. D., Weber, M. J. (2003). Influence of sensory abilities on the interpersonal distance of the elderly. Environment & Behavior, 35, 695-711.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Williams, L. E., Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322, 606-607.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Worchel, S., Teddlie, C. (1976). The experience of crowding: A two-factor theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 30-40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Yeeles, A. (2015). Weathering unrest: The ecology of urban social disturbances in Africa and Asia. Journal of Peace Research, 52, 158-170.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zhong, C. B., Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19, 838-842.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A., Smith, G. M. (2009). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York, NY: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Access

    does not have access to this content.

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

JCC-article-ppv for GBP29.00
JCC-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP177.42
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $227.46

Top