Amidst increasingly equality in belief and in practice between the sexes, we ask if height preferences still matter, and if so, why people say they matter. First, we collected data from Yahoo! dating personal advertisements. Second, we used answers to open-ended questions in an online survey. The Yahoo! data document that height is still important in decisions to date but that it is more important to females than to males. Results from the online survey indicate that women wanted tall men for a variety of reasons, but most of the explanations of our respondents were connected to societal expectations or gender stereotypes. Gender-based legitimation of height preferences seem to be more central than evolutionary-based legitimation, but future work may discover a more nuanced interpretation.

Bartlett, K. T. (1994). Only girls wear barrettes: Dress and appearance standards, community norms, and workplace equality. Michigan Law Review, 92, 2541-2582.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Blackwell, D. L., Lichter, D. T. (2004). Homogamy among dating, cohabitating, and married couples. Sociological Quarterly, 45, 719-737.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Buss, D. M., Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Pyschological Review, 100, 204-232.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Clark, C. L., Shaver, P. R., Abrahams, M. F. (1999). Strategic behaviors in romantic relationship initiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 709-722.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Courtiol, A., Raymond, M., Godelle, B., Ferdy, J. (2010). Mate choice and human stature: Homogamy as a unified framework for understanding mating preferences. Evolution, 64, 2189-2203.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Dawson, B. L., McIntosh, W. D. (2006). Sexual strategies theory and internet personal advertisements. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 614-617.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Fink, B., Neave, N., Brewer, G., Pawlowski, B. (2007). Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in stature (SDS): Further evidence for an adjustment in relation to own height. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 2249-2257.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gillis, J. S., Avis., W. E. (1980). The male-taller norm in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 396-401.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Glasser, C. L., Robnett, B., Feliciano, C. (2009). Internet daters’ body type preferences: Race-ethnic and gender differences. Sex Roles, 61, 14-33.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gray, J. P., Wolfe, L. D. (1980). Height and sexual dimorphism of stature among human societies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 53, 441-456.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Hall, J. A., Canterberry, M. (2011). Sexism and assertive courtship strategies. Sex Roles, 65, 840-853.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hrdy, S. B. (1999). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Jaeger, M. M. (2011). “A thing of beauty is a joy forever”? Returns to physical attractiveness over the life course. Social Forces, 89, 983-1003.
Google Scholar | ISI
Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Joyner, K., Kao, G. (2005). Interracial relationships and transition to adulthood. American Sociological Review, 70, 563-581.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Judge, T. A., Cable, D. M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary tests of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428-441.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kortt, M., Leigh, A. (2010). Does size matter in Australia? Economic Record, 86(272), 71-83.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lynn, M. W., Bolig, R. (1985). Personal advertisements: Sources of data about relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 377-383.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
McDowell, M. A., Fryar, C. D., Ogden, C. L., Flegal, K. M. (2008). Anthropometric reference data for children and adults: United States, 2003-2006. National Health Statistics Reports, 10, 1-44.
Google Scholar
McIntosh, W. D., Locker, L., Briley, K., Ryan, R., Scott, A. J. (2011). What do older adults seek in their potential romantic partners? Evidence from online personal ads. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 72, 67-82.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Morgan, E. M., Richards, T. C., VanNess, E. M. (2010). Comparing narratives of personal and preferred partner characteristics in online dating advertisements. Computers in Human Behaviors, 26, 883-888.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Nettle, D. (2002). Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British Men. Human Nature, 13, 473-491.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Orr, A. (2004). Meeting, mating, and cheating: Sex, love, and the new world of online dating. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Google Scholar
Pawlowski, B. (2003). Variable preference for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 270, 709-712.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Pawlowski, B., Dunbar, R. I., Lipowicz, A. (2000). Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature, 43, 156.
Google Scholar
Pierce, C. (1996). Body height and romantic attraction: A meta-analytic test of the male-taller norm. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 143-150.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pisanski, K., Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Cross-cultural variation in mate preferences for averageness, symmetry, body size, and masculinity. Cross-Cultural Research, 47, 162-197.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Pryor, J. B., Merluzzi, T. V. (1985). The role of expertise in processing social interaction scripts. Journal of Experiemental Social Psychology, 21, 362-379.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 157-175.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Robnett, B., Feliciano, C. (2011). Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Social Forces, 89, 807-828.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Salska, I., Frederick, D. A., Pawlowski, B., Reilly, A. H., Laird, K. T., Rudd, N. A. (2008). Conditional mate preferences: Factors influencing preferences for height. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 203-215.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sautter, J. M., Tippett, R. M., Morgan, S. P. (2006, March). Check out my profile: Demographic characteristics of the internet dating population. Paper presented at the Southern Sociological Society Meetings, New Orleans, LA.
Google Scholar
Sear, R., Marlowe, F. W. (2009). How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate. Biology Letters, 5, 606-609.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Shepperd, J. A., Strathman, A. J. (1989). Attractiveness and height: The role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 617-627.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sorokowski, P., Sorokowska, A., Fink, B., Mberira, M. (2012). Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in stature (SDS) might not be universal: Data from a semi-nomad population (Himba) in Namibia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 32-37.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Stewart, S., Stinnett, H., Rosenfeld, L. B. (2000). Sex differences in desired characteristics of short-term and long-term relationship partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 843-853.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Swami, V., Furnham, A., Balakumar, N., Williams, C., Canaway, K. (2008). Factors influencing preferences for height: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 395-400.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tovee, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A., Mangalparsad, R. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 443-456.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Yancey, G. (2009). Crossracial differences in the racial preferences of potential dating partners: A test of the alienation of African Americans and social dominance orientation. Sociological Quarterly, 50, 121-143.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JFI-article-ppv for $36.00