The remoteness of democratic representation

First Published October 12, 2021 Research Article

Democratic representation is increasingly remote from citizens. Many institutions exacerbate this remoteness, but the shrinking ratio of legislative representatives to citizens is perhaps the most obvious. Around the world, the number of representatives has not kept pace with growing populations. To what extent does this distance, between citizens and their elected politicians, explain our current democratic malaise? Relying on both quantitative and historical evidence, this article maps the remoteness of democratic representation and considers its causes, consequences, and potential remedies. Strongly associated with economic inequality and rural elites, the remoteness of representation has far-flung implications, ranging from deficits of diversity and accountability in political representation to the weakened capacity of citizens to engage in political collective action.

Acemoglu, D, Johnson, S, Robinson, JA (2005) Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. In: Aghion, P, Durlauf, S (eds). Handbook of Economic Growth. Elsevier, 385472. doi: 10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Albertus, M (2017) Landowners and democracy. World Politics 69(2): 233276.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Annenberg Public Policy Center (2016) Americans’ knowledge of the branches of government is declining. In: The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. Available at: https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/americans-knowledge-of-the-branches-of-government-is-declining/(accessed on 5 June 2020).
Google Scholar
Ardanaz, M, Scartascini, C (2013) Inequality and personal income taxation. Comparative Political Studies 46(12): 16361663.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Auriol, E, Gary-Bobo, RJ (2012) On the optimal number of representatives. Public Choice 153(3–4): 419445. Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Beck, N, Katz, JN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89: 634647. JSTOR.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bell, A, Fairbrother, M, Jones, K (2019) Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice. Quality & Quantity 53(2): 10511074. Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berman, S (2019) Democracy and Dictatorship in Europe: From the Ancien Régime to the Present Day. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Bhatti, Y, Hansen, KM (2019) Voter turnout and municipal amalgamations-evidence from Denmark. Local Government Studies 45(5): 697723.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Blom‐Hansen, J, Houlberg, K, Serritzlew, S (2021) Jurisdiction size and local government effectiveness: assessing the effects of municipal amalgamations on performance. European Journal of Political Research 60(1): 153174.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Boone, C, Wahman, M (2015) Rural bias in African electoral systems: legacies of unequal representation in African democracies. Electoral Studies 40: 335346. Elsevier.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brady, K, Witting, V (2020) Germany Seeks Electoral Reform to Avoid XXL Bundestag. DW.COM, 25 August. Available at: https://www.dw.com/en/germany-seeks-electoral-reform-to-avoid-xxl-bundestag/a-54694043 (accessed on 30 December 2020).
Google Scholar
Carey, JM, Hix, S (2011) The electoral sweet spot: low‐magnitude proportional electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 383397.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chen, J, Malhotra, N (2007) The law of k/n: the effect of chamber size on government spending in bicameral legislatures. American Political Science Review 101(4): 657676. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cinelli, C, Hazlett, C (2020) Making sense of sensitivity: Extending omitted variable bias. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 82(1): 3967. doi: 10.1111/rssb.12348.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Coppedge, M, Gerring, J, Knutsen, CH, et al. (2021) “V-Dem [Country–Year/Country–Date] Dataset v11.1”. Varieties of Democracy Project. doi: 10.23696/VDEMDS21.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cox, GW, McCubbins, MD (2001) The institutional determinants of economic policy. In: Haggard, S, McCubbins, MD (eds), Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. Cambridge, UK New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2163.
Google Scholar
Easterly, W (2007) Inequality does cause underdevelopment: insights from a new instrument. Journal of Development Economics 84(2): 755776. Elsevier.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Eaton, K (2014) Recentralization and the left turn in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies 47(8): 11301157. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications Sage CA.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Elkins, Z, Ginsburg, T (2021) Characteristics of national constitutions. version 3.0. Available at: comparativeconstitutionsproject.org
Google Scholar
Ensley, MJ, Tofias, MW, De Marchi, S (2009) District complexity as an advantage in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science 53(4): 9901005. Wiley Online Library.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gallagher, M (1991) Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies 10(1): 3351. Elsevier.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gallagher, M (2019) Election Indices Dataset. Retrieved from http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/people/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/index.php
Google Scholar
Gandhi, J, Lust-Okar, E (2009) Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science 12: 403422.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gerring, J, Veenendaal, W (2020) Population and Politics: The Impact of Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gilligan, TW, Matsusaka, JG (2001) Fiscal policy, legislature size, and political parties: evidence from state and local governments in the first half of the 20th century. National Tax Journal The University of Chicago Press, 54(1): 5782. The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hayes, D, Lawless, JL (2018) The decline of local news and its effects: new evidence from longitudinal data. The Journal of Politics 80(1): 332336. The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Inter-Parliamentary Union (2019) Inter-parliamentary union data. Retrieved from https://data.ipu.org/content/list-fields
Google Scholar
Kedar, O, Harsgor, L, Sheinerman, RA (2016) Are voters equal under proportional representation? American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 676691. Wiley Online Library.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Landemore, H (2013) Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives. Synthese 190(7): 12091231. Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lijphart, A (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Comparative European Politics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lijphart, A (2012) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. 2nd edition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Manin, B (1997) The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Margaritondo, G (2021) Size of national assemblies: the classic derivation of the cube-root law is conceptually flawed. Frontiers in PhysicsFrontiers 8: 606.
Google Scholar
Marland, A (2019) Fewer politicians and smaller assemblies: how party elites rationalise reducing the number of seats in a legislature - lessons from Canada. The Journal of Legislative Studies 25(2): 149168. Taylor and Francis.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mignozzetti, UG, Cepaluni, G (2019) Legislature size and welfare: evidence from Brazil. preprint, 14 October. SocArXiv. DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/8r97e.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Moore, B (1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.
Google Scholar
Nicolau, JM (1997) As distorções na representação dos estados na câmara dos deputados brasileira. Dados 40(3): 441464.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ostwald, K, Courtin, C (2020) Malapportionment in Myanmar’s elections: a slumbering menace. Contemporary Southeast Asia 42(2): 145173. ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pettersson-Lidbom, P (2012) Does the size of the legislature affect the size of government? Evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Public Economics 96(3–4): 269278. Elsevier.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Powell, GB (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Revel, M, Lin, T, Halpern, D (2021) The Optimal Size of an Epistemic Congress. arXiv:2107.01042 [cs]. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.01042.
Google Scholar
Santos, WG (1986) Sessenta E Quatro: Anatomia Da Crise. São Paulo: Vértice.
Google Scholar
Shah, A (2021) What if we selected our leaders by lottery? Democracy by sortition, liberal elections and communist revolutionaries. Development and Change 52(4): 687728.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Solt, F (2020) Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: the standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly 101(3): 11831199. Wiley Online Library.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Taagepera, R (1972) The size of national assemblies. Social Science Research 1(4): 385401. Elsevier.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Taagepera, R, Shugart, MS (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Weyland, KG (1998) The politics of corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy. Johns Hopkins University Press, 9(2): 108121.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wooldridge, JM (2019) Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. Journal of Econometrics, 211(1): 137150. Elsevier.
Google Scholar | Crossref
World Bank (2021) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
Zucco, C, Power, TJ (2021) Fragmentation without cleavages? Endogenous fractionalization in the Brazilian party system. Comparative Politics 53(3): 477500.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

PPQ-article-ppv for GBP29.00
PPQ-article-ppv for $37.50

Article available in:

Related Articles

Articles Citing this One: 0