This study demonstrates the existence of a sex difference in facial contrast. By measuring carefully controlled photographic images, female faces were shown to have greater luminance contrast between the eyes, lips, and the surrounding skin than did male faces. This sex difference in facial contrast was found to influence the perception of facial gender. An androgynous face can be made to appear female by increasing the facial contrast, or to appear male by decreasing the facial contrast. Application of cosmetics was found to consistently increase facial contrast. Female faces wearing cosmetics had greater facial contrast than the same faces not wearing cosmetics. Female facial beauty is known to be closely linked to sex differences, with femininity considered attractive. These results suggest that cosmetics may function in part by exaggerating a sexually dimorphic attribute—facial contrast—to make the face appear more feminine and hence attractive.

Aucoin, K , 1997 Making Faces (Boston, MA: Little, Brown).
Google Scholar
Brown, B, Iverson, A, 1997 Bobbi Brown Beauty (New York: HarperCollins).
Google Scholar
Bruce, V, Burton, A M, Dench, N, 1994 “What's distinctive about a distinctive face?” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 47 119149.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Burton, A M, Bruce, V, Dench, N, 1993 “What's the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement” Perception 22 153176.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cárdenas, R A, Harris, L J, 2006 “Symmetrical decorations enhance the attractiveness of faces and abstract designs” Evolution and Human Behavior 27 118.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cash, T F, Dawson, K, Davis, P, Bowen, M, Galumbeck, C, 1989 “Effects of cosmetics use on the physical attractiveness and body image of American college women” Journal of Social Psychology 129 349355.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cox, C L, Glick, W H, 1986 “Resume evaluations and cosmetics use: When more is not better” Sex Roles 14 5158.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cunningham, M R , 1986 “Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 925935.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Darwin, C , 1871 The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex (London: John Murray).
Google Scholar
Dobbelsteyn, C, Joffres, M, MacLean, D, Flowerdew, G, 2001 “A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors. The Canadian Heart Health Surveys” International Journal of Obesity 25 652661.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Edwards, E A, Duntley, S Q, 1939 “The pigments and color of living human” skin American Journal of Anatomy 65 133.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Etcoff, N , 1999 Survival of the Prettiest: The Science of Beauty (New York: Doubleday).
Google Scholar
Farkas, L G, Munro, I R, 1987 Anthropometric Facial Proportions in Medicine (Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas).
Google Scholar
Fink, B, Neave, N, 2005 “The biology of facial beauty” International Journal of Cosmetic Science 27 317325.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Fink, B, Penton-Voak, I, 2002 “Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness” Current Directions in Psychological Science 11 154158.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Frost, P , 1988 “Human skin color: A possible relationship between its sexual dimorphism and its social perception” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 32 3858.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Frost, P , 2005 Fair Women, Dark Men (Christchurch: Cybereditions).
Google Scholar
Graham, J A, Jouhar, A J, 1981 “The effects of cosmetics on person perception” International Journal of Cosmetic Science 3 199210.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Huguet, P, Croizet, J-C, Richetin, J, 2004 “Is “What has been cared for” necessarily good? Further evidence for the negative impact of cosmetics use on impression formation” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34 17521771.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jablonski, N G, Chaplin, G, 2000 “The evolution of human skin coloration” Journal of Human Evolution 39 57106.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Jones, D M, Hill, K, 1993 “Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations” Human Nature 4 271296.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Langlois, J H, Roggman, L A, 1990 “Attractive faces are only average” Psychological Science 1 115121.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Law Smith, M J, Perrett, D I, Jones, B C, Cornwell, R E, Moore, F R, Feinberg, D R, Boothroyd, L G, Durrani, S J, Stirrat, M R, Whiten, S, Pitman, R M, Hillier, S G, 2006 “Facial appearance is a cue to oestrogen levels in women” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273 135140.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Liu, C H, Collin, C A, Burton, A M, Chaudhuri, A, 1999 “Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative” Vision Research 39 40034009.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Mulhern, R, Fieldman, G, Hussey, T, Leveque, J-L, Pineau, P, 2003 “Do cosmetics enhance female Caucasian facial attractiveness?” International Journal of Cosmetic Science 25 199205.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
O'Toole, A J, Deffenbacher, K A, Valentin, D, McKee, K, Huff, D, Abdi, H, 1998 “The perception of face gender: The role of stimulus structure in recognition and classification” Memory & Cognition 26 146160.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Ogden, C, Fryar, C, Carrol, M, Flegal, K, 2004 Mean Body Weight, Height, and Body Mass Index, United States 1960–2002 Advance data from vital and health statistics, no 347 (Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics).
Google Scholar
Perrett, D I, Lee, K J, Penton-Voak, I, Rowland, D, Yoshikawa, S, Burt, D M, Henzi, S P, Castles, D L, Akamatsu, S, 1998 “Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness” Nature 394 884887.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Rhodes, G , 2006 “The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty” Annual Review of Psychology 57 199226.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Russell, R , 2003 “Sex, beauty, and the relative luminance of facial features” Perception 32 10931107.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Russell, R, Biederman, I, Nederhouser, M, Sinha, P, 2007 “The utility of surface reflectance for the recognition of upright and inverted faces” Vision Research 47 157165.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Russell, R, Sinha, P, Biederman, I, Nederhouser, M, 2006 “Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation” Perception 35 749759.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sinha, P , 2002 “Qualitative representations for recognition” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) 2525 249262.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Thornhill, R, Gangestad, S W, 1993 “Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance” Human Nature 4 237269.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Watt, R J , 1994 “A computational examination of image segmentation and the initial stages of human vision” Perception 23 383398.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zebrowitz, L A , 1997 Reading Faces: Window to the Soul? (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).
Google Scholar
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

PEC-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $259.33

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top