Abstract
Prior research has demonstrated that the display of agentic behaviors, such as dominance, can produce backlash against female leaders because of the incongruence between these behaviors and prescribed gender roles. The current study was designed to fill a gap in existing research by investigating whether these well-established findings are moderated by race. Results revealed that dominant Black female leaders did not create the same backlash that dominant White female leaders did. Experimental evidence confirmed that White female (and Black male) leaders were conferred lower status when they expressed dominance rather than communality, whereas Black female (and White male) leaders were not. These findings highlight the importance, and complexity, of considering the intersection of gender and race when examining penalties for and proscriptions against dominant behavior of female leaders.
References
|
Beale, F. (1970). Double jeopardy: To be Black and female. In Bambara, T. C. (Ed.), The Black woman: An anthology (pp. 90–100). New York, NY: Signet. Google Scholar | |
|
Bell, E., Nkomo, S. (2001). Our separate ways: Black and White women and the struggle for professional identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Brescoll, V. L., Dawson, E., Uhlmann, E. L. (2010). Hard won and easily lost: The fragile status of leaders in gender-stereotype-incongruent occupations. Psychological Science, 21, 1640–1642. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Brescoll, V. L., Uhlmann, E. L. (2008). Can an angry woman get ahead? Status conferral, gender, and expression of emotion in the workplace. Psychological Science, 19, 268–275. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bryant, A. (2010, February 20). Xerox’s new chief tries to redefine its culture. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com Google Scholar | |
|
Chung-Herrera, B., Lankau, M. (2005). Are we there yet? An assessment of fit between stereotypes of minority managers and the successful-manager prototype. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2029–2056. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Eagly, A. H., Carli, L. C. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., Kolb, D. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10, 474–493. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ensari, N., Miller, N. (2002). The out-group must not be so bad after all: The effects of disclosure, typicality, and salience on intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 313–329. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hall, E. V., Phillips, K. W., Rudman, L. A, Glick, P., Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., Washington, E. F. (2012). [Descriptive and prescriptive stereotypes as a function of race and gender]. Unpublished raw data. Google Scholar | |
|
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Livingston, R. W., Pearce, N. A. (2009). The teddy-bear effect: Does having a baby face benefit Black chief executive officers? Psychological Science, 20, 1229–1236. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Navarrete, C. D., McDonald, M. M., Molina, L. E., Sidanius, J. (2010). Prejudice at the nexus of race and gender: An outgroup male target hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 933–945. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Nye, J., Forsyth, D. (1991). The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals: A test of leadership categorization theory. Small Group Research, 22, 360–379. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Okimoto, T. G., Brescoll, V. L. (2010). The price of power: Power-seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 923–936. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Purdie-Vaughns, V., Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rosette, A. S., Leonardelli, G., Phillips, K. W. (2008). The White standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 758–777. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Rudman, L. A., Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle-managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Rudman, L. A., Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rudman, L. A., Phelan, J. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Scott, K. A., Brown, D. J. (2006). Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 230–242. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sesko, A. K., Biernat, M. (2010). Prototypes of race and gender: The invisibility of Black women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 356–360. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effects of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 86–94. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
