Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content

Abstract

This study aimed to examine personal goal setting and identity processes in Czech university students. A total of 1,347 Czech emerging adults completed the questionnaires on goal setting, identity commitment, and identity exploration in various life domains (romantic relationship, education, and work). First, our study showed that in our sample, goals related to education were the most prominent. Second, higher identity commitment or exploration in one domain predicted setting the goal in the same domain, supporting the notion of the interrelatedness of identity formation and goal pursuit. Additionally, those who set work-related goals reported fewer goals associated with romantic partnership, marriage, and family, suggesting individual differences in goal preferences. Our study adds to the knowledge of European emerging adults’ identity processes and goal selection processes. Furthermore, our findings stress the holistic approach when investigating personal goals.
The concept of personal goals has a long history in psychology. It has been conceptualized in various ways in the literature, for example, such as personal projects (Little, 1983), life tasks (Cantor et al., 1987), personal strivings (Emmons, 1986), or developmental goals and projects (Heckhausen, 1999). Despite the different terminologies, all these constructs refer to personal goals, which are based on individuals’ motives (Stuchlikova & Mazehoova, 2014). They can also be conceived of as future-oriented representations of what individuals strive to achieve in various life domains (Austin & Vancouver, 1996; Karniol & Ross, 1996). As such, they simultaneously reflect the personality of an individual and the features of his or her culturally defined life contexts (Cantor et al., 1991; Little, 1983). According to the life span theory, individuals of different ages experience different development environments based on their age (Heckhausen et al., 2010; Nurmi, 1991; Salmela-Aro, 2009). Moreover, they typically select and adjust their personal goals according to the developmental tasks and transitions of their age group (e.g., Havighurst, 1948; Heckhausen et al., 2010; Salmela-Aro, 2009).
In emerging adulthood, individuals face more transitions than they do at any other stage of life (Arnett, 2014). These include transitioning from education to work, starting a career, initiating an intimate relationship, and starting a family (Arnett, 2014). Indeed, worldwide studies have shown that young people in the third decade of their lives are formulating and simultaneously committing to the personal goals related to career and romantic relationships (e.g., Bangerter et al., 2001; Dietrich et al., 2013; Lietz et al., 2016; Marttinen & Salmela-Aro, 2012; Turner et al., 2014).
The study described here recruited Czech emerging adults whose lifestyles do not differ substantially from the lives of their peers in other Western and Central European countries (Arnett, 2006; Macek et al., 2007). In the domain of school and career, easily recognizable tendencies define emerging adulthood. At ages 18– 24, about 60% of Czechs are still in some form of formal studies (Česky statisticky úřad [ČSÚ], 2014), and each year, the number of college students increases. In this context, the average age of first marriage, and the first childbirth, increased in the last decades. The average age of individuals’ first marriage is now 28 years for women and 31 years for men (ČSÚ, 2014). However, at ages 20–24, 21% of young Czechs live in a partnership; at ages 25–29, this is 52% (Kohoutová & Nývlt, 2014). Considering the similarities in developmental tasks and transitions between Czech emerging adults and their peers from other European and American countries, we presume that the most prominent personal goals are related to education and romantic partnership in Czech emerging adults.
Some studies have tried to determine whether love or work is more important for young people (e.g., Salmela-Aro et al., 2007; Seiffge-Krenke & Luyckx, 2013). Thus, our first research question was, Do Czech emerging adults prioritize goals related to education or goals related to romantic relationships?
Identity formation is closely related to goal pursuit. Following the identity status paradigm (Marcia, 1993), we consider identity as a developmental process of commitment formation following exploration while we refer to the identity commitment, like personal goals, as the person’s values in different domains of life (Kunnen et al., 2008). Since emerging adults find themselves in changing contexts, they continuously reflect on their chosen goals, and their commitment to specific goals can change (Luyckx et al., 2008). As such, the process of constructing personal goals and plans to realize them can also be seen as a mean of identity construction (Marttinen et al., 2016). Thus, during the transitions, the formulation of and the commitment to realistic goals can be indicators of successful adaptation during the life span development (Salmela-Aro & Nurmi, 1997). For example, emerging adults who are highly committed to love and work scored highest on psychosocial and health correlates such as life satisfaction, work satisfaction, and work stress, among others (Luyckx et al., 2014).
However, individuals differ in goal hierarchies and the strength of their commitment and exploration in various life domains (e.g., Luyckx et al., 2014; Marttinen et al., 2016; Ranta et al., 2014). More concretely, emerging adults can identify with one life domain (work, education, or romantic relationship) or multiple life domains simultaneously (Kunnen et al., 2008; Ranta et al., 2014). For example, in the study of Ranta et al. (2014), different goal profiles have been recognized concerning emerging adults’ goal hierarchies (career and romantic relationship). Similarly, Luyckx et al. (2014) examined emerging adults’ identity configurations across two domains—love and work. They found that whereas some configurations were characterized by firm commitments in one or both domains, other configurations consisted of individuals scoring low on commitment and high on exploration and rumination (Luyckx et al., 2014). These findings support the notion that goals setting and identity formation are closely related and that individuals differ in their focus on one or more life domains (Luyckx et al., 2008; Marttinen et al., 2016).
Hence, our second research question was: To what extent are identity commitments and exploration in a particular life domain (work, education, and romantic relationship) related to emerging adults’ personal goals either within or outside of that life domain?
Additionally, our third research question was: Is setting the personal goals in one life domain related to setting the personal goal in another life domain?

Method

Participants and Procedure

We utilized the data from a 5-year longitudinal panel study Pathways into adulthood conducted in the Czech Republic during the 2012–2016 period. The primary purpose of this project was to examine how emerging adults develop autonomy and identity associated with their relationships, education, and work (for more information on data collection and sample, see Umemura, Lacinová, & Macek, 2015). The data on different relevant topics were collected at three time points over 1 year. In this study, we analyzed the cross-sectional data collected over four periods (March 2013, July 2013, December 2013, and March 2014). All questionnaires were administered online. For the study, only university students born between 1987 and 1995 were selected from the total sample. This study included 1,347 young people with the mean age of 21.49 years (SD = 1.32). This sample was overrepresented by females (77.1%).

Measures

Strength and content of the exploration and commitments

We used a Czech version of the Groningen Identity Development Scale (Konečná et al., 2010) to assess the strength and content of the exploration and commitment. This scale was originally developed by Bosma (1985) and later adapted to Czech by Konečná et al. (2010). The modified scale comprises 11 items, with 7 items measuring commitment and 4 items measuring exploration. The strength of commitment was measured by items such as, “Does this…(commitment)…give you the feeling that you know what to do with your life?” The exploration level was measured by item, “Do you talk with others about…(exploration)?” Emerging adults’ exploration and commitment were assessed in the following domains: current studies, current work, romantic relationships, and relationships with parents. The responses were measured on a 4-point scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree/never) to 4 (completely agree/often). The commitment scales had α scores between .75 and .90 across domains. The exploration scales had α scores between .60 and .70 across domains.

Personal Goals

The participants were asked to list up to three current personal goals in response to the following instruction based on a revised version of Little’s idiographic Personal Project Analysis inventory (Little et al., 2007; Salmela-Aro, 2001):
People have many kinds of issues and goals they think about, hope for, and try to accomplish. Consider the personal projects you have in your life at the moment. These projects may be related to any life domain, such as education, work, family, or self-related issues.
Two independent assessors categorized the goals to match identity domains. Those categories included education (e.g., “get accepted to dream university,” “successfully finishing the studies”); work (“to find a job” and “change the job”); and romantic relationship, marriage, and parenthood (“to find a romantic partner,” “to improve romantic relationship,” “get married,” and “have children”). The κ was between .74 and .82. The content of each goal category was coded on a dichotomous scale for further analyses: 0 = no goals mentioned in this category and 1 = at least one goal mentioned in this category.

Results

Do Czech Emerging Adults Prioritize Goals Related to Education or Goals Related to Romantic Relationships?

Table 1 depicts the distribution in goal categories. The most prominent goal category was education, mentioned by 81.6% of emerging adults. The goals related to work and to the romantic relationship, marriage, and parenthood were mentioned by approximately half of the respondents.
Table 1. Distribution of Czech University Students Across Goal Categories.
Goal Categories%N
Education81.61,099
Work50.8684
Romantic relationship, marriage, and parenthood49.4665

To What Extent Are Identity Commitments and Exploration in a Particular Life Domain (Work, Education, and Romantic Relationship) Related to Emerging Adults’ Personal Goals Either Within or Outside of That Life Domain?

Binominal logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of commitment and exploration in domains of work, study, and romantic relationship, marriage, and parenthood on the likelihood that participants’ set goals related to each of these domains. Our results showed that a higher commitment to romantic partnership is associated with an increased likelihood of setting a goal related to a romantic relationship, marriage, and family (see Table 2). Additionally, a higher educational commitment was related to an increased likelihood of setting a work goal (see Table 3). Further, logistic regression revealed that those who scored higher on work and study exploration are more likely to formulate educational goals (see Table 4).
Table 2. Logistic Regression Predicting the Likelihood of Setting Goal Related to Romantic Partnership, Marriage, and Parenthood Based on Commitment and Exploration in Domains of Romantic Partnership, Study, and Work.
VariablesBSEWalddfpOdds Ratio95% CI for Odds Ratio
LowerUpper
E-RR0.130.180.551.461.140.811.61
C-RR0.580.255.411.021.791.102.94
E-S−0.280.241.301.250.760.471.22
C-S0.390.213.271.071.470.972.25
E-W0.050.210.071.801.060.691.61
C-W0.100.160.381.541.100.811.50
Constant−3.071.206.541.010.05  
Note. E = exploration; C = commitment; RR = romantic relationship; S = current study; W = current work; P = parents; df = degrees of freedom; CI = confidence interval.
Table 3. Logistic Regression Predicting the Likelihood of Setting Goal Related to Work Based on Commitment and Exploration in Domains of Romantic Partnership, Study, and Work.
VariablesBSEWalddfpOdds Ratio95% CI for Odds Ratio
LowerUpper
E-RR0.160.180.861.351.180.831.67
C-RR0.0500.250.041.841.050.651.71
E-S−0.400.242.731.100.670.421.078
C-S0.510.225.571.021.661.102.54
E-W0.250.211.371.241.290.841.96
C-W0.010.160.101.931.010.751.38
Constant−1.621.181.831.170.20  
Note. E = exploration; C = commitment; RR = romantic relationship; S = current study; W = current work; P = parents; df = degrees of freedom; CI = confidence interval.
Table 4. Logistic Regression Predicting the Likelihood of Setting Educational Goals Based on Commitment and Exploration in Domains of the Romantic Partnership, Study, and Work.
VariablesBSEWalddfpOdds Ratio95% CI for Odds Ratio
LowerUpper
E-RR−.410.262.511.110.660.401.10
C-RR.170.360.221.641.180.592.37
E-S.660.333.981.041.931.013.69
C-S.520.293.351.071.690.962.96
E-W−.650.324.281.040.520.280.97
C-W.180.220.671.411.200.781.85
Constant.031.620.001.991.03  
Note. E = exploration; C = commitment; RR = romantic relationship; S = current study; W = current work; P = parents; df = degrees of freedom; CI = confidence interval.

Is Setting the Personal Goals in One Life Domain Related to Setting the Personal Goal in Another Life Domain?

Additionally, we tested how setting the goal in one life domain relates to setting the goal in another life domain. Those who set the goal related to work were significantly less likely to set goals related to romantic partnership, marriage, and family, χ2(1, N = 1,347) = 28.901, p < .001 (see Table 5). More concretely, those who set the goal related to work mentioned the goals related to romantic partnership, marriage, and family less often (adjusted residuals = −5.4). However, those who set goals related to work were no more or less likely to set the goal related to education, χ2(1, N = 1,347) = 2.816, p = .093. Additionally, those who set the goal related to education did not differ in setting the goal related to romantic partnership, marriage, and parenthood, χ2(1, N = 1,347) = 0.041, p = .840.
Table 5. Crosstabulation of Setting a Goal Related to Work and Setting a Goal Related to Romantic Partnership, Marriage, and Parenthood.
Goal Related to WorkGoal Related to Romantic Partnership, Marriage, and Parenthood
NoYes
No385 (5.4)273 (−5.4)
Yes297 (−5.4)387 (5.4)
Note. Adjusted residuals appear in parentheses below observed frequencies.

Discussion

Our study aimed to investigate the formulation of personal goals and identity processes in Czech university students. First, our results showed that goals related to education were the most prominent, suggesting that young people emphasize educational goals more than they do goals related to romantic partnership and starting a family (e.g., Salmela-Aro et al., 2007). However, considering the average age of our sample (22 years) and the average age when Czech people enter the first marriage (28 years for women and 31 years for men), our results are in line with the notion that individuals’ personal goals depend on developmental tasks of their age-group in the particular cultural environment (Cantor et al., 1991; Heckhausen et al., 2010; Salmela-Aro, 2009).
Second, we proposed that identity formation is closely related to goal pursuit (Luyckx et al., 2008; Marttinen et al., 2016). Our results indeed showed the interrelatedness of identity commitment or identity exploration in a particular domain with personal goal setting in a corresponding domain. More concretely, a higher commitment to the romantic partnership was associated with an increased likelihood of setting a goal related to romantic partnership, marriage, and family. On the other hand, emerging adults who scored higher on educational commitment were more likely to set work goals. Additionally, setting educational goals was connected to a more in-depth exploration of study and work domains. These findings support the notion that emerging adulthood is a period of career preparation during which young people often combine school and work. It is known that university students usually have part-time jobs to support themselves financially, even though these jobs are not directly relevant to their future career plans (Arnett, 2014). In such a case, evaluating the fit of current work may lead young people to strive for an educational goal that would enable them to work in a more suitable job.
Finally, individuals differ in goal hierarchies and identity profiles (e.g., Marttinen et al., 2016; Ranta et al., 2014). In our study, those who set the goal related to work were less likely to mention goals connected with romantic partnership, marriage, and family. Following other studies (Nurmi & Salmela-Aro, 2002; Ranta et al., 2014), we suggest that goal preference depends upon current life situation (e.g., romantic partnership status and satisfaction). For example, those who focus on a career may not be in a satisfying relationship. Unfortunately, one study limitation was that our data did not allow us to consider the current life situation of the participants in such details.
Our findings showed that Czech emerging adults set educational goals related primarily to their current developmental transition. By showing that higher commitment or exploration in one domain predicted setting the goal in the same domain, our study demonstrated that goal pursuit and identity formation are indeed related. Additionally, our results suggest that individuals differ in goal hierarchies and the strength of their commitment to and exploration of various life domains, as some focus more on partnership and some on a career. However, our findings need further investigation with a more representative sample.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Domov, vývoj a demokracie: 2020 (MUNI/0955/2019).

ORCID iD

Open practices

Data and materials for this study have not been made publicly available. The design and analysis plans were not preregistered.

References

Arnett J. J. (2006). Emerging adulthood in Europe: A response to Bynner. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260500523671
Arnett J. J. (2014). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach. Prentice Hall.
Austin J. T., Vancouver J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 338–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.3.338
Bangerter A., Grob A., Krings F. (2001). Personal goals at age 25 in three generations of the twentieth century. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60(2), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1024//1421-0185.60.2.59
Bosma H. A. (1985). Identity development in adolescence. Coping with commitments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Groningen. Personal goals as motivational phenomenon.
Cantor N., Norem J., Langston C., Zirkel S., Fleeson W., Cook-Flannagan C. (1991). Life tasks and daily life experience. Journal of Personality, 59(3), 425–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00255.x
Cantor N., Norem J., Niedenthal P., Langston C., Brower A. (1987). Life tasks, self-concept ideals and cognitive strategies in a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1178–1191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1178
Česky statisticky úřad. (2014). Vybrané demografické údaje v České republice [Demographic data on Czech Republic]. https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/20541931/3201814_0101.pdf/69279796-27ca-4da8-9022-0be0b8b48f85?version=1.0
Dietrich J., Shulman S., Nurmi J. E. (2013). Goal pursuit in young adulthood: The role of personality and motivation in goal appraisal trajectories across 6 years. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 728–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.004
Emmons R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1058
Havighurst R. J. (1948). Developmental tasks and education. University of Chicago Press.
Heckhausen J. (1999). Developmental regulation in adulthood: Age-normative and sociostructural constraints as adaptive challenges. Cambridge University Press.
Heckhausen J., Wrosch C., Schulz R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017668
Karniol R., Ross M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 593–620. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.593
Kohoutová I., Nývlt O. (2014, April 9). Rodina a statistika [Family and statistics]. http://www.czso.cz/csu/tz.nsf/i/prezentace_z_tk_rodina_a_statistika/$File/csu_tk_rodina_prezentace.pdf
Konečná V., Neusar A., Sokoliová M., Macek P. (2010). Možnosti zkoumání formování identity v adolescenci: česká adaptace metody GIDS [Possibilities of adolescent identity formation research: Czech adaptation of GIDS method]. Československá Psychologie, 54(4), 391–406.
Kunnen E. S., Sappa V., van Geert P. L. C., Bonica L. (2008). The shapes of commitment development in emerging adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 15(3–4), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-008-9042-y
Lietz F., Piumatti G., Mosso C., Marinkovic J., Bjegovic-Mikanovic V. (2016). Testing multidimensional well-being among university community samples in Italy and Serbia. Health Promotion International, 33(2), 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daw082
Little B. R. (1983). Personal projects: A rationale and method for investigation. Environment and Behavior, 15(3), 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916583153002
Little B. R., Salmela-Aro K., Phillips S. (2007). Personal project pursuit: Goals, action and human flourishing. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Luyckx K., Schwartz S. J., Berzonsky M. D., Soenens B., Vansteenkiste M., Smits I., Goossens L. (2008). Capturing ruminative exploration: Extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.004
Luyckx K., Seiffge-Krenke I., Schwartz S. J., Crocetti E., Klimstra T. (2014). Identity configurations across love and work in emerging adults in romantic relationships. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.03.007
Macek P., Bejček J., Vaníčková J. (2007). Contemporary Czech emerging adults: Generation growing up in the period of social changes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(5), 444–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558407305417
Marcia J. E. (1993). The status of the statuses: Research review. In Marcia J. E., Waterman A. S., Matteson D. R., Archer S. L., Orlofsky J. L. (Eds.), Ego identity. A handbook for psychosocial research (pp. 22–41). Springer Verlag.
Marttinen E., Dietrich J., Salmela-Aro K. (2016). Dark shadows of rumination: Finnish young adults’ identity profiles, personal goals and concerns. Journal of Adolescence, 47, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.024
Marttinen E., Salmela-Aro K. (2012). Personal goal orientations and subjective well-being of adolescents. Japanese Psychological Research, 54(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5884.2012.00521.x
Nurmi J.-E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11(1), 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(91)90002-6
Nurmi J.-E., Salmela-Aro K. (2002). Goal construction, reconstruction and depressive symptoms in a life-span context: The transition from school to work. Journal of Personality, 70(3), 385–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.05009
Ranta M., Dietrich J., Salmela-Aro K. (2014). Career and romantic relationship goals and concerns during emerging adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 2(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813515852
Salmela-Aro K. (2001). Personal goals during transition to adulthood. In Nurmi J.-E. (Ed.), Navigating through adolescence (pp. 59–84). RoutledgeFalmer.
Salmela-Aro K. (2009). Personal goals and well-being during critical life transitions: The four C’s—Channelling, choice, co-agency and compensation. Advances in Life Course Research, 14(1–2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2009.03.003
Salmela-Aro K., Aunola K., Nurmi J.-E. (2007). A 10-year follow up. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22(6), 690–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558407303978
Salmela-Aro K., Nurmi J. E. (1997). Goal contents, well-being, and life context during transition to university: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/016502597385234
Seiffge-Krenke I., Luyckx K. (2013). Competent in work and love? Emerging adults’ trajectories in dealing with work-partnership conflicts and links to health functioning. Emerging Adulthood, 2(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696813516090
Stuchlíková I., Mazehóová Y. (2014). Osobní cíle jako motivační fenomén [Personal goals as motivational phenomenon]. Československá Psychologie, 58(5), 471–484.
Turner J. J., Wilmoth J. D., Phillips T. M. (2014). What do you want to accomplish in the next 10 years? The goals of emerging adults. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 2(3), 87–96.
Umemura T., Lacinová L., Macek P. (2015). Is emerging adults' attachment preference for the romantic partner transferred from their attachment preferences for their mother, father, and friends? Emerging Adulthood, 3, 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696814561767.

Biographies

Lucia Kvasková is a doctoral student in the developmental psychology program at the Masaryk University, Czech Republic. Her research interests include emerging adults’ career development in relation to social support, attachment, and personality. Lately, she engages in research on career adaptability of “forgotten half”.
Jan Širůček, PhD, is an assistant professor at the Department of Psychology at the Masaryk University, Czech Republic. His major research interests are psychomerics, psychology of individual differences, and social cognition.
Stanislav Ježek is an associate professor of Psychology. He is teaching psychology research methods courses at Masaryk University, Czech Republic. He is focusing on psychometrics and data analysis from longitudinal studies of development in adolescence and early adulthood.
Lucie Hrubá is a social researcher focusing on social inequalities in education and poverty. In her psychological studies she was primarily interested in emerging adulhood topic.
Lenka Lacinová is an associate professor of Psychology and Head of the Department of Psychology at Faculty of social studies in Masaryk University, Czech Republic. Her research interests are attachment, interparental conflict, family and romantic relationships across the lifespan.
Petr Macek is a professor of Psychology and head of the Institute for Research on Children, Youth and Family at Masaryk University, Czech Republic with expertise in cross-national and cross-cultural research on adolescent and emerging adult. His research topics are focused on identity, self, interpersonal relationships, and civic and political participation.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Create a link to share a read only version of this article with your colleagues and friends. For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Please read and accept the terms and conditions and check the box to generate a sharing link.

terms and conditions

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 23, 2020
Issue published: April 2022

Keywords

  1. personal goals
  2. identity classes
  3. emerging adults
  4. work
  5. romantic partner
  6. parents

Rights and permissions

© 2020 Society for the Study of Emerging Adulthood and SAGE Publishing.
Request permissions for this article.

Open practices

Authors

Affiliations

Jan Širůček
Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Stanislav Ježek
Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Lucie Hrubá
Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
Lenka Lacinová
Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Petr Macek
Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

Notes

Lucia Kvasková, Psychology Department, Masaryk University, Joštova 218/10, Brno 602 00, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Emerging Adulthood.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 431

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 2 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 4

  1. Longitudinal Links Between Identity Development and the Vision of One’s Adult Life in Emerging Adulthood
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fostering Bonds Across Generations: Exploring Intergenerational Contact, Grandparent Idealization, and Their Influence on the Personal Values and Goals of Young Adult Grandchildren
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frozen goals in the context of the developmental characteristics of emerging adulthood
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Navigating the ups and downs: Peer and family autonomy support during personal goals and crises on identity development
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

SSEA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

SSEA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.